WHY LOBBYING SHOULD
PROBABLY BE ILLEGAL
Speaking of the NRA, between 1998 and 2015, they spent somewhere between 2 and 2.5 million dollars a year on lobbying (HERE). Doesn't sound like so much to me, particularly in light of what we've recently learned it costs to bend the ear of a certain past Secretary of State. Any way you look at it, it's small potatoes compared to what BIG PHARMA is spending on lobbying. If we simply look at the makers of opioids as their own entity (as opposed to looking at the entire pharmaceutical industry), we learn that they've spent many times more, knowing good and well that an EPIDEMIC OF OPIOD ADDICTION was in full swing. Take a gander at these stats from Monday's article in Business Insider by Erin Brodwin (it was based on THIS ARTICLE).
- Opioid drugmakers including Purdue Pharma, the maker of OxyContin, spent more than $880 million, or roughly $98 million per year, on lobbying and campaign contributions that included efforts to support the drugs.
- Drugmakers and allied advocacy groups employed a yearly average of 1,350 lobbyists in legislative centers.
- In 2015 alone, 227 million opioid prescriptions were given out in the US, or "enough to hand a bottle of pills to nine out of every 10 American adults."
- Purdue Pharma, the company that makes OxyContin, made $2.4 billion from opioid sales last year alone.
Gulp! This is exactly why you can't trust EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE. It's all too often bought and paid for --- just like our politicians. In fact, what we really need to do is require politicians to dress like NASCAR drivers. Ever noticed how NASCAR drivers and their cars are covered with the names and logos of their sponsors? The bigger the sponsorship, the bigger the logo. Only instead of Home Depot, Great Clips, Tide, or any of a myriad of other businesses, we would have members of congress in their three-piece suits or dresses, with the Purdue Pharma, GLAXOSMITHKLINE, or PFIZER logos printed on them.